Friday, April 10, 2015

“The Future Universe Time-Line" and End of the 2015 Universe Phophecy


“The Future Universe Time-Line"

by: R. Kawecki

 

The last event in the Cosmos never predicted by its people to ever to occur

 

     Some call a perdiction made is a Phophecy. In physical cosmology, first light refers to the light emitted from the first generation of stars formed less than a billion years after the big bang, which brought to an end the cosmological Dark Ages. But first light is actually a perdiction made that explains light that manifested through a black hole that emitted the spreading eruption as in slow motion that shows the first deity of the universes creation into existence. Researching the explosion of a dense 10 +1020cm bang comparison with a small mesquito the time the explosion occured at in milliseconds seems like a light year bloomatic event. Current theory is divided on whether the first stars were very massive or not - theories proposed in 2009 and 2011 suggest the first star groups might have consisted of a massive star surrounded by several smaller stars a group governed by a nucleus star. One theory, which seems to be borne out by computer models of star formation, is that with no heavy elements and a much warmer interstellar medium from the Big Bang, it was easy to form stars with much greater total mass than the ones visible.

 

    The Dark Ages are currently thought to have lasted between 150 million to 800 million years after the Big Bang. The October 2010 discovery of UDFy-38135539, the first observed galaxy to have existed during the following deionization epoch, gives us a window into these times. The galaxy earliest in this period observed and thus also the most distant galaxy ever observed is currently on the record they found the galaxy UDFj-39546284 to be at a time some 480 million years after the Big Bang or about halfway through the Cosmic Dark Ages at a distance of about 13.2 billion light-years. More recently, the UDFj-39546284 galaxy was found to be around "380 million years" after the Big Bang and at a distance of 13.37 billion light-years.

 

    Hydrogen and helium atoms begin to form as the density of the Universe falls. This is thought to have occurred about 377,000 years after the Big Bang. Hydrogen and helium are at the beginning ionized, i.e., no electrons are bound to the nuclei, which (containing positively charged protons) are therefore electrically charged (+1 and +2 respectively). As the Universe cools down, the electrons get captured by the ions, forming electrically neutral atoms. This process is relatively fast (and faster for the helium than for the hydrogen), and is known as recombination. At the end of recombination, most of the protons in the Universe are bound up in neutral atoms.

 

   Structure formation in the big bang model proceeds hierarchically, with smaller structures forming before larger ones. The first structures to form are quasars, which are thought to be bright, early active galaxies.

 

   We see in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, after being greatly cooled by the expansion of the Universe. Around the same time, existing pressure waves within the electron-baryon plasma — known as baryon acoustic oscillations — became embedded in the distribution of matter as it condensed, giving rise to a very slight preference in distribution of large scale objects. Therefore the cosmic microwave background is a picture of the Universe at the end of this epoch including the tiny fluctuations generated during inflation (see diagram), and the spread of objects such as galaxies in the Universe.

 

    The Solar System began forming about 4.6 billion years ago, or about 9 billion years after the Big Bang. A fragment of a molecular cloud made mostly of hydrogen and traces of other elements began to collapse, forming a large sphere in the center which would become the Sun, as well as a surrounding disk. The surrounding accretion disk would coalesce into a multitude of smaller objects that would become planets, asteroids, and comets. The Sun is a late-generation star, and the Solar System incorporates matter created by previous generations of stars.

 

    The Big Bang is estimated to have occurred about 13.8 billion years ago.[35] Since the expansion of the Universe appears to be accelerating, its large-scale structure is likely to be the largest structure that will ever form in the Universe. The present accelerated expansion prevents any more inflationary structures entering the horizon and prevents new gravitationally bound structures from forming.

 

    Over a timescale of a billion years or more, the Earth and Solar System are unstable. Earth's existing biosphere is expected to vanish in about a billion years, as the Sun's heat production gradually increases to the point that liquid water and life are unlikely; the Earth's magnetic fields, axial tilt and atmosphere are subject to long term change; and the Solar System itself is chaotic over million- and billion-year timescales; Eventually in around 5.4 billion years from now, the core of the Sun will become hot enough to trigger hydrogen fusion in its surrounding shell. This will cause the outer layers of the star to expand greatly, and the star will enter a phase of its life in which it is called a red giant. Within 7.5 billion years, the Sun will have expanded to a radius of 1.2 AU—256 times its current size, and studies announced in 2008 show that due to tidal interaction between Sun and Earth, Earth would actually fall back into a lower orbit, and get engulfed and incorporated inside the Sun before the Sun reaches its largest size, despite the Sun losing about 38% of its mass. The Sun itself will continue to exist for many billions of years, passing through a number of phases, and eventually ending up as a long-lived white dwarf. Eventually, after billions more years, the Sun will finally cease to shine altogether, becoming a black dwarf.

 

Big Rip: = 20 billion years from now

 

    This scenario is possible only if the energy density of dark energy actually increases without limit over time. Such dark energy is called phantom energy and is unlike any known kind of energy.  Phantom energy is layered by a fabric surface tension where above this surface exists a free openness. It can be imagined with our planet earth. The surface is the planet ground where we stand as inhabitances’ having a clear blue sky above us. Above that of course is the outer realm space itself. In this analogy, the expansion rate of the Universe will increase without limit.

 

    A newer present 2015 theory called “Quanta Physics Theory “asserts and steps in with this analogy about the end of the universe illustrating its new discovery that shows that the universe expansion rate is now identified as it wasn't before this year. In this new theory the universe’s expansion rate is now measured at length at 450,000 miles a second. A number and velocity much faster than light. If the mathematics are founded and true then the speed of a material particle is not constant as science perdicts today. Using the flow of the universes inflation rate if the flow of expansion is consistent and there exist no contradictive theory to say it isn’t – then the universe expansion does not increase over time. It is believed that the expansion rate velocity of the universe’s expansion has been the same since it first began 13.6 billion years ago and broke away through the fabric and will never change. When a man blows up a balloon the flow of pressure he uses is constant until it is relieved.  With this new evidence in Quanta Physics Theory we reside on the outside of the Hubble balloon not inside it. Any rapid change in the universe would have to occur from the inside of the bubble inflation causing the whole bubble to collapse or explode venturing the end of the universe in this way.

 

    Gravitationally bound systems, such as clusters of galaxies, galaxies, and ultimately the Solar System will not be torn apart as first thought. For gravitational collapse to occur the expansion rate has to change.

In any event it’s more likely that the pressure that is expanding the universe will slow down rather than speed up out of control. Gravitational collapse here illustrates the rushing of the water from a sink pressure handle turned up and would mean there is an increase in the proceeding pressure force. In all likelihood it’s more likely to run out of pressure from the source rather than a rapid increase. The pressure illuminating the bubble comes from a source most likely holding a near constant pressure atmosphere.

 

    With a rapid phantom energy dark energy increasing eventually the expansion will have to be so rapid as to overcome the electromagnetic forces holding molecules and atoms together. As a whole the universe like the black holes that exist at the center of the galaxies the universe has to have a place the pressure is entering the bubble that causes its expansion in the first place so we should assume that like the galaxies the universe has an open valve or black hole for a pressure entre point.

 

    It is most likely rapid expansion will not be the manner the universe ends. Finally even atomic nuclei will be torn apart and the Universe as we know it will end in an unusual kind of gravitational singularity. At the time of this singularity, the expansion rate of the Universe will reach infinity, so that any and all forces (no matter how strong) that hold composite objects together (no matter how closely) will be overcome by this expansion, literally tearing everything apart. Chunks of matter will reside in a zero point environment and all life will die away.

 

Big Crunch: = 102 billion years from now

 

    If the energy densities of dark energy were negative or the Universe were closed, then it would be possible that the expansion of the Universe would reverse and the Universe would contract towards a hot, dense state. This is a required element of oscillatory universe scenarios, such as the cyclic model, although a Big Crunch does not necessarily imply an oscillatory Universe. Current observations suggest that this model of the Universe is unlikely to be correct, and the expansion will continue or even accelerate.

 

Big Freeze: = 105 billion years from now

 

Future of an expanding universe and Heat death of the universe

 

    This scenario is generally considered to be the most likely, as it occurs if the Universe continues expanding as it has been. Over a time scale on the order of 1014 years or less, existing stars burn out, stars cease to be created, and the Universe goes dark. Over a much longer time scale in the eras following this, the galaxy evaporates as the stellar remnants comprising it escape into space, and black holes evaporate via Hawking radiation. In some grand unified theories, proton decay after at least 1034 years will convert the remaining interstellar gas and stellar remnants into leptons (such as positrons and electrons) and photons. Some positrons and electrons will then recombine into photons. In this case, the Universe has reached a high-entropy state consisting of a bath of particles and low-energy radiation. It is not known however whether it eventually achieves thermodynamic equilibrium.

 

Heat Death: 101000 years from now

 

 Heat death of the universe

 

    The heat death is a possible final state of the Universe, estimated at after 101000 years, in which it has "run down" to a state of no thermodynamic free energy to sustain motion or life. In physical terms, it has reached maximum entropy (because of this, the term "entropy" has often been confused with Heat Death, to the point of entropy being labeled as the "force killing the universe"). The hypothesis of a universal heat death stems from the 1850s ideas of William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) who extrapolated the theory of heat views of mechanical energy loss in nature, as embodied in the first two laws of thermodynamics, to universal operation.

 

Vacuum meta-stability event

 

 False vacuum

 

    If our universe is in a very long-lived false vacuum, it is possible that a small region of the Universe will tunnel into a lower energy state (see Bubble nucleation). If this happens, all structures within will be destroyed instantaneously and the region will expand at near light speed, bringing destruction without any forewarning.

 

    While predictions of the future can never be absolutely certain present scientific understanding in various fields has allowed a projected course for the farthest future events to be sketched out, if only in the broadest strokes. These fields include astrophysics, which has revealed how planets and stars form, interact, and die; particle physics, which has revealed how matter behaves at the smallest scales; evolutionary biology, which predicts how life will evolve over time; and plate tectonics, which show how continents shift over millennia.

 

    All predictions of the future of the Earth, the Solar System, and the Universe must account for the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy, or a loss of the energy available to do work, must increase over time. Stars eventually must exhaust their supply of hydrogen fuel and burn out. Close encounters will gravitationally fling planets from their star systems, and star systems from galaxies. Eventually, matter itself will come under the influence of radioactive decay, as even the most stable materials break apart into subatomic particles. Current data suggests that the Universe is flat, and thus, will not collapse in on itself after a finite time, and the infinite future potentially allows for the occurrence of a number of massively improbable events, such as the formation of a Boltzmann Brain.

 

    The timelines displayed here cover events from roughly eight thousand years from now to the farthest reaches of future time.

 

    The ultimate fate of the Universe is a topic in physical cosmology. Many possible fates are predicted by rival scientific hypotheses, including futures of both finite and infinite duration.

 

    Once the notion that the Universe started with a rapid inflation nicknamed the Big Bang became accepted by the majority of scientists, the ultimate fate of the Universe became a valid cosmological question, one depending upon the physical properties of the mass/energy in the Universe, its average density, and the rate of expansion (450,000 miles per second each second) 2½ degrees is the Kawecki light speed constant.

 

    There is a growing consensus among cosmologists that the Universe is flat and will continue to expand forever. The ultimate fate of the Universe is dependent on the shape of the Universe and what role dark energy will play as the Universe ages.

 

₠²

Friday, March 20, 2015

THE BIG BANG HASN'T HAPPEN AS PHYSICISTS THINK


THE LATEST NEW THEORY ABOUT THE UNIVERSE
       HOW IT ALL STARTED  
       BY: RODNEY KAWECKI  2015.03.22

Front page news....................

     Physicists have talked about what is known as The Big Bang Event. A time when everything about the universe began existence. What this article is about is that bang that supposively began everything of the cosmos never happen. How do I know this - because  the universe is expanding in a constant flow of pressure. How did matter and what is the universe is explained in Rod Kawecki's next book soon to become published. It expalins how and why the flow of pressure expanding the universe is made about how matter formed from it and where it all came from. Isn't that about what everyone wants to know about that expalins the univesre? I think so.

  So what are we talking about?  A material universe formed from the first flow of energy that formed from some other place in the cosmos. The universe is not just we assume it is. This universe the universe we call our universe is presumably a string of many many other cosmos universe's or possible other universe realms probably much much different that this one. The creation of the bubble Stephen Hawkings calls the bubble where Edwin Hubble calls a balloon is inflating getting bigger and bigger along the ages. As the bubble (universe) gets bigger so does the distance between the galaxies as Edwin Hubble explained in The Univesre Recessing Universe Theory.

  The universe expanding means the space of Dirac;s Sea is getting greater and greater. As the sea gets bigger the celestial matter the galaxies theorectially get smaller in the comparison. The flow of the pressure filling the bubble expands the bubble and as it does matter that lays on top the bubble surface fabric as the flow of energy first began passed through the fabric lining like a leak from a stretched lining a leak that occured without breaking the bubble. During first light as the leak started up pieces and chunks of the fabric due to the forces that occured breaking through the space fabric formed the first real development of matter - matter that dense pressure molded and concenstrated into planetary matter. To try and explain this we should look at the idea about the space fabric the stuff the sphere's planets and galaxies lay on bending, stretching and curving the fabric space surface creating the leak in the fabric called First Light - also formed a positive material planetary matter substance. Without going into chemistry specific's at first light the matter formed first is the reasomn it lays outside the bubble on its surface the pressure that arrived afterwords formed the expansion surface. This is the explanation of what our universe is.  

 You haven't seen anything about a big bang yet have you but its coming? Will it happen? Do you think so? Look at it this way - the space fabric the surface all our galaxies lay upon impressing its weight and energy downwards creating a spin between the fabric element positive energy and the planetary energy repeling pushing away from each other making the galaxies and planets spin. It sounds kinda easy that way but it really is more complicated then that.

   Has the big bang happen yet not yet?  Space that somehow materializes matter from the process of developement shows that as a fabric itself and as all matter retains energy positive energy most likely - is not single sided either since matter exist with it. Will the big bang happen in the future? We can look at the univesre and the space in it having a resistance positive resistance between it and matter we should look at space dirac's sea as being the dominated realm of the two. That there doesn't really exist a critical density between them BUT - it is matter that will chunch as the flow of pressure between the two are challenged. It is this challenge that the big bang theory was invented by. Looking at the universe in more least excessive terminolgy the flow of expansion eliminates any type a barrier and or slows down any extreme challenging pressure prolonging such resistance but it is my belief that the filling of Dirac's Sea will never be able to be challenged that might cauise any type of bang bang of any kind. We are safe now - but we should watch out.
    Alien's existing in the further edge of the realm made before us and developing before us have greater technologies like the galaxies that have black hole positioning from the over flow of matter and pressure - finding the center of the universe would direct them to the more weaker or younger galactic bodies if they were to act hustle towards us because we might be different - well. But like all the planetary sphere's that exist throughout the cosmos - basically their all somewhat the same - round oval gaseous type matter surfaces life on some as such we all were formed from the same single body flow of energy and matter. So we should all be in some way alike. But if like the galaxies were all formed in the aftermath as individual celestial orbs there could be a lot of intercontrollable indifferences.

   Big bang or NOT as this article explains  - we are all here for a nano- time line in astronomical termonology.  I prefer to believe that actions of god was made for the better of all things in his world.

 

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

IF OBSERVATION OF A PARTICLE ZOOMING ACROSS A ROOM AT 300 THOUSAND TIMES FASTER THAN LIGHT IS DETECTABLE IN A LABORATORY THAN I WOULD SAY TIME TRAVEL ISN'T POSSIBLE....


IF OBSERVATION OF A PARTICLE ZOOMING ACROSS A ROOM AT 300 THOUSAND TIMES FASTER THAN LIGHT IS DETECTABLE IN A LABORATORY THAN I WOULD SAY TIME TRAVEL ISN'T POSSIBLE....

Causality principle and time travelerability

According to Dr Wang, this strange result does not threaten Einstein's theories - in particular, the causality principle, which states that a cause must precede its effect. Or so almost all physicists think - for now. Privately, some admit that experiments such as Dr Wang's may force a reassessment of some cherished ideas. According to Dr Guenter Nimtz, of the University of Cologne, who has carried out similar experiments, the NEC work is very exciting. He told BBC News Online: "The effect cannot be used to go back in time, only to reduce the time between cause and effect a little bit. "The reason for this," he said, "is because the light pulse has a finite length of time, much longer than any gain obtained by a faster-than-light speed.

Scientists have seen a pulse of light emerge from a cloud of gas before it even entered. This astonishing and baffling observation was made by researchers from the NEC Research Institute in Princeton, US. They conducted an experiment that involved lasers, a chamber containing cold caesium atoms and a super-fast stopwatch. The end result was a beam of light that moved at 300 times the theoretical limit for the speed of light. It was Einstein who said nothing physical could break this barrier because, among other things, to do so would also mean travelling back in time.

The work of Dr. Lijun Wang at the NEC research institute in Princeton seems to have given us a glimpse of multi-dimensional reality. When Wang recently transmitted a pulse of light towards a chamber filled with specially treated cesium gas, and recorded its travel through the chamber at an accelerated speed of up to 300 times the speed of light, he proved the possibility of time travel.

Before the pulse fully entered the chamber, Wang reported that it appeared at the same instant at a point 60 feet across the laboratory. In effect, it existed in two places at the same time. Thus Wang not only proved that objects can move at speeds exceeding the earlier prescribed limit of 186,000 miles per second, but he proved Einstein's theory that time slows when objects travel at a speed approaching (and exceeding) the speed of light. The implications of this are mind-boggling. Wang's work hints that time travel is quite possible.

The universe we know of today illustrates how space might well be made of a gas from which an objects speed may be a deterrent. IN any case this gaseous space is not a part of the bubble we as human beings reside out of in an open expanding projectile surface the bubble proceeds.

Time travel relative to the Dr. Lijun Wang experiment seems to illustrate how objects might be boosted if a reverse directional gravity warp drive was implemented on a ship's engine acceleration drivers. Acting instantaneous since known space as a vacuum results in no physical inertia forces the vacuum creating a chamber containing cold caesium atoms could be implemented using concentrated casium gas enough that it forms a chamber in the vacuum that then proceeds the gravity reverse warp drive acceleration engage. But what Dr. Wang didn't tell us is how he was able to photograph such an event in a laboratory at such extreme velocity if time travel at light speed was not the result. To say time travel might be possible and to be able to photograph it seems to me to show time travel is not possible. I'm sure trying to not stay within the Einstein barriers is not acceptable is not exactly easy.

Since time is part of the universe, it began at the Big Bang, so there simply is no 'before the Big Bang'. There was a 'previous universe' that underwent a 'Big Crunch'. This view is seen in some theories of quantum gravity like quantum loop gravity, where the singularity predicted from view is smoothed out by quantum effects.

The universe itself resides in a multi-dimensional realm of 'strings' or 'branes' that can collide and produce 'big bangs'. This is the view promoted by string or M-theories. In theory we observe the results of an expanding universe from which we don;t know how or where the pressure is engaged yet the universe expands. We don't reside in the bubble but reside outside of it around its outer surface. We observe the results of the universe expanding and matter separating at maximum velocity because we are at its upper edge so we observe the affect of the expansion. Like the bubble we cannot actually see a leak somewhere like a black hole keeps pushing pressure in it so it expands. multi-dimension theory only tells us what we already know and that if the heart of a human body is bleeding we don't observe the result or the blood inside the body from the outside. As a famous physicist once said: "The Big Bang theory says nothing about what banged, how it banged, why it banged, or even if it banged at all."But what he was really saying is we are only a part of it. If it falls we will too.

Some believe god was there first in a empty universe - yet god is the deity of life, a world empty of god is truely a universe empty. As long as the universe expands we stand to observe the results of a big crunch, expanding forever, a big bang, freeze lost of heat masses or see it rip but in all the cases we should realize that what ever it is it came from somewhere to far away.

In quanta Physics we want to look at gravity as a repulsive force. Indifferent from relativity and Isaac newton's gravity is due to attraction. The idea that things that act during free fall are attracted to another object. We explain this with are sun and its nine orbiting planets. Observation of this as an attraction force the earth acts in free fall with the sun. Its falling towards it. This can be observed in a few different ways. One that the earth is falling towards the sun. Two the earth is being attracted to the sun due to the suns greater energy and three that its the earths physical weight that due to the universe's tilt the earth falls towards the sun because of its weight and attraction. But we want to look at gravity as a repulsive force. A repulsive force means that in all the events I just mentioned the earth is actually being pushed away from the sun. We look at the idea in the first example showing that the earth is not being attracted to the sun but is being pushed away - this example illustrates the earth is in free fall in the direction of the sun because the sun's mass is so much greater that the mass of the earth that it physically falls towards the sun but looking at this action as a repulsion force we observe the earth being pushed away from the sun because of its energy potential. The idea that the sun's energy mass is so much greater than the earths that they repel each others energy which creates a astronomical distance away from one another. Secondly, we observe the earth in free fall not being attracted but pushed away from it. We can observe this affect with all the other nine planets in the same way. That because all positive energy repels it is due because they all formed from the same singularity as well as they are all positive energy deities. The sun creates a deep curvature in space that also according to relativity physics all celestial spheres fall towards it. Even though this is true based on the curvature of the sun laying deep in the fabric of space that all these nearby celestial s all fall towards it but when we want to observe a force of gravitation we have to look for the reason why. Basically we the sun which is much larger than all the nine planets that orbit around it causing them to fall in a direction towards it we also discover that there is a subtle distance all the planets also orbit around the sun at.

Looking at gravity as a repulsive force we discover that the content of all the planets and their independent energy mass and because they all retain a positive energy content that they are not actually attracted to the sun but are kept each at a distance away from the sun because of the amount of energy mass each of the planets retain as a whole that they are being kept at a distance away from the sun. WE can also see that as the distance gets further and further away in distance that this repulsion energy that keeps the planets at a distance will also fade away and became fragile. We look at the solar system and observation of its planets all orbiting the sun. A sun that's mass is thousands of times the size and mass of the other nine planets. We see using Newton's law of gravity that we can physically predict the distance the planets orbit at a distance from the sun by calculating the planets mass. We look at the repulsive force theory with earths surface deities and calculate the same distance. That the surface objects in free fall are being pushed away due to the earth's energy content that is much greater than the falling surface objects. Doing so we calculate the distance at 9.8 meters a second for all the objects.

We observe free fall as a means to calculate a velocity and distance of an object in relationship with other positively charged entities. Relativity has shown how space itself tells matter what to do whereas matter tells space to curve. This si also a repulsive presentation called as an example Probe 'B" in modern physics literature.

We look at the idea that gravity force is an attractive force due to the direction of an objects free fall towards where alot of people seem to think that attraction is more like a magnetic force and become confused. Using attraction as a force example for gravity in both a planets force of gravity and gravity in space as a attraction does not allow a reason for Newton's measurements for object free fall nor explain the reason why. Looking at gravity as an repulsive force between the balance of a masses energy content allows a means to calculate the reason for the balance between the two masses. We can look at thsi new idea by using are earth moon for the example. We have the earths moon orbiting earth at an angle - observing the direction of free fall of the moon orbiting the earth as attraction in the free fall we observe and ask the question of why the moon does not fall on the earth its attracted towards. But if we look at this same activity with understand that the reason the moon orbits earth is based on its potential energy. Whereas same energies repel they are kept at a distance because of it. We also discover that over time that are new theory also predicts a possible free fall collision from its moon in the later future. though it seems not safe to reason the threat of an end it is more likely that we as earth beings alien to the future cosmos it might be better to wisely research and calculate such ending events that may occur in the celestial future.